Friday, January 18, 2008

From Christian to Atheist

Introduction

It is with some trepidation that I write this but I need to come clean with a number of friends around the world and writing it down seems to be the best way of structuring an explanation of where I find myself.


My journey out of faith

First of all I didn't wake up one day and decide "hey I am going to become an atheist". In fact I don't think its possible to become an atheist as atheism is an absence of belief in God rather than a positive belief in something.

It happened like this. One day I realised that I no longer believed that there was a need for a God in order for me to exist or life itself to be worthwhile. The main question that I could not answer from my Christian beliefs was "who created God?". If biological life needed something to create it then God needs a creator. One answer is that God has always just existed, but you could say that about life itself. Maybe life has always existed? We know that’s not true because of evolution and if the bible is wrong about the origins of life (which it clearly is - animals did not appear as fixed species and human history is longer than the 6000 years the bible suggests) then it must be wrong about all sorts of other things.

If Adam did not exist and did not sin then there is no need for a second Adam. Indeed, suppose that atonement was necessary, how could the death of one man actually make God change his mind, especially if the man dying was actually God? It all started to unravel when I looked at the logic of the whole scheme of Christianity.

I did try to discuss these issues with various Christian friends but the universal advice I got was variations on "just believe". In other words, just pretend to believe, agree to all the creeds, but don't really believe and you will be OK when you die, just in case you were wrong. This did not make any sense to me. It had no integrity to it so I had to accept that I did not believe any more and just tell people the truth.

This seemed to be an honest approach, but it was quite challenging for them. Generally their response was to argue in favour of God's existence either from creation or by trying to prove the historical accuracy of scripture (on the basis that if it is right about history then it must be right about theology). It was rather like being cross examined by an advocate who also did not know the real truth but knew what the law said.

I also looked at the standard proofs for the existence of God from Thomas Aquinas and St Anselm, but I did not find these either helpful or convincing.


One brave person

One brave person called Ross (thank you Ross) from a church I attended years ago did engage with me by email which was very kind of him. This included the big question of how anything can exist (creation out of nothing).

I replied:

If God created everything out of nothing, where was he when he did it?

Thats the problem with using that argument, it actually pushes any possibility of God out of the picture.
Matter can not be created or destroyed it just exists and changes.
Science uses superstring theory in physics to suggest that the universe expands and contracts so there is no need for a single big bang event
or something being created from nothing.

In fact Jewish thinking is that God created himself in Genesis chapter one.
Early Christians separated the idea of the creator God from the God, whom they were praying to, which is one reason why Jesus gets assumed to be pre existent and doing the creative acts in Genesis 1.
This allowed the father to be higher than the son/creator.

This also raises the argument in favour of God from complexity.
i.e. something as complex as our world must have been created by something greater than itself.
The same can be said about God.
There must have been something bigger than God that created him, yet if thats true then God is not God.
Therefore the argument from complexity is also self defeating.

This is the problem. There is just not enough evidence for the existence of God or for the need for a God in order for things to be the way they are.


Some reactions from my other Christian friends

These have ranged from "I always knew there was something not quite right about you" to quotations from the parable of the sower about some seed falling on stony ground where it withers and dies, as if this is an occupational hazard and not something they have to be too concerned about. I have also had a large number say "I will be praying for you". I wonder how long they will pray for me?



The overall results and effects

First the negatives:

  • I have no contact with any of my friends from church. No one from the church has contacted me since I said I was stopping going. Its like I have stopped existing. It turned out they were all conditional friendships. This has been very painful. People who I thought cared about me as a person turned out to only care about me as a soul that could be won or lost and put on the trophy shelf (in some ways I do feel like a bit of a fool thinking they were my friends, I imagine I am a bit like someone coming out of a cult, I have a bereavement process to go through). To be fair I have not tried to contact them but a couple of them have walked to the other side of the street to avoid me so I have been a bit scared to contact them.
  • There is a certain embarassment factor involved in how other people see me. I was a person of faith for so long that they would expect me losing it to have wrecked my life, but I have not really changed.


Now the positives:



  • I now realise that only I can help myself. There are no quick fixes or miracle cures. If I am going to make my life better then I have to do it myself. I am no longer bound by the guilt of having to seek professional help rather than prayer or miracle cures so I am going into inter personal therapy with a psychologist and making various changes to my life to improve my wellbeing.

  • I have developed a great interest in nature. As a Christian I could climb a mountain look down and say "how great is the world that God has created", but I had little interest in the workings of the natural world. Since my deconversion I have started to get great pleasure from small things like watching spiders build webs and birds feeding in the garden. Its as if I can see my place in the world in context for the first time and I enjoy watching all the other living things.

  • I can see a point to living. I now know what I am here for. As well as passing on my genes to my children the world is being built on the actions that I and all the other people living today are taking every day. Human progress is actually an accumulation of what everyone from every previous generation has done. We all build on what has gone before, so I really believe that I am actually worth something rather than being a soul who may or may not end up in a lake of fire.




Some thoughts about the church

At the same time as I was going through this I started to realise some things about the church I had been attending for about eighteen months:

If you joined and your life was not significantly transformed within six to nine months they lost interest in you.

They did not like people asking difficult questions and in group bible studies they asked people not to disagree with any of the material during the group discussion but take it up with the leaders afterwards (something that really set my alarm bells ringing, actually I laughed the first time I heard it because I thought it was a wind up).

A large number of people had drifted through the church over the years so they were used to people leaving. It seemed like a good place to be where everything worked for the people that were there, but what was happening was that of all the people who passed through the only ones that stayed were those for whom it worked. Therefore it gave the impression that it was making a difference to the lives of those who were there and that it could do the same for anyone. I call this the "filter effect".

So what was happening was that people were drifting through the church and if their lives were changed for the better they stuck in the filter and this created the group of people who made up the church.



Some side issues for Christians to consider

At the same time I was becoming very concerned about contemporary Christianity's urge to distance itself from science and discourage scientific explanations for physical effects. At a simple level mental illness has to be caused by a demon not by physiological changes in the brain. I was very concerned that I was bringin up my children in an environment where science was not trusted and they were not going to be able to acheive their full potential as contributors to society by being part of a ghetto.




To set the record straight
Just to be absolutely clear I was a soundly converted, born again, bible believing, spirit filled Christian and I was attending a Pentecostal church when all of this happened. I was not lacking in any aspect of my experience of God. If anything I was looking for facts to back up experience and found the facts to be extremely lacking once the surface was scratched.

Updates
Since I originally wrote this article I have clarified some of the issues in another article - click here to read it.

Please read this before commenting on this article
I welcome comments on my blog and generally let them all through whether negative or positive.

However, this article is my personal opinion and feelings on these issues.
I am not saying I am right and you are wrong.
I am not interested in promoting atheism or trying to destroy Christianity.
In fact if Christianity can be destroyed by one blog article then it really can't be much of a faith.
It is entirely possible that I might change my mind again at some point, but if I do it will be because I have found evidence for God, not because someone on the internet has expressed concern about the fate of my soul or argued with me about the flood or how the evolution of the eyeball.

If you still want to comment then please go ahead.




    Labels: , , , ,

     

    Del.icio.us
    Post this story to Del.icio.us
    Digg
    Post this story to Digg
    Reddit
    Post this story to reddit
    StumbleUpon
    Post this story to stumbleupon

    14 Comments:

    Blogger Andrew said...

    A very well written and actually quite moving story when you were talking about the positive changes to your life since your deconversion.

    January 22, 2008  
    Blogger Richard Corfield said...

    It was a lovely story to read and a reminder for myself of the things I find good in the world without god(s).

    January 24, 2008  
    Blogger cabbagesofdoom said...

    I've had a similar deconversion and, likewise, find my life more positive since. I haven't really had your courage to come completely clean with my friends and family, though, as I know they still believe quite strongly. (I don't pretend I am still a Christian, I just haven't explicitly told them I'm not.) This is partly because I don't want them to think I am attacking them. I wish there was some way to really emphasise the positive aspects of atheism rather than simply attacking the (albeit many) negative aspects of organised religion. Your personal positives do just this and are my favourite part of your blog. I think they are worthy of repeating and emphasising. If you make a third blog on this issue, please make it about these!

    January 26, 2008  
    Blogger Andrew said...

    Nice article. Thanks for sharing.

    About this comment:

    "I imagine I am a bit like someone coming out of a cult..."

    Actually, you are coming out of a cult. Just because it calls itself "Christian," does not make it something more than a cult.

    February 03, 2008  
    Blogger John Blake said...

    Gordon, you said "I imagine I am a bit like someone coming out of a cult". No, it wasn't that 'it was a bit like that' but was exactly that. Mainstream religions think they are 'different' to cults but are really identical; just bigger.

    Good luck and welcome to the real world.

    February 21, 2008  
    Blogger ahtrust said...

    Please take a look at website www.ahtrust.net

    What do you think?

    Are you interested?

    Can you be of assistance?

    kind regards
    Den

    April 01, 2008  
    Blogger Gordon said...

    I am not sure why you think an atheist would want to support a Christian theme park!?

    April 01, 2008  
    Blogger JAYT said...

    Gordon,

    Heartening to read a story like yours.

    There're probably a million and one other reasons not to believe in a God.

    A few I've thought about recently:

    Random disasters like the Tsunami. It didn't matter which religion you followed or, none. Your age, whether you lived a good life or bad. 250,000 people, dead. "God works in mysterious ways" is somehow so far off the mark.

    A bit facetious, but if God's so damned clever why are 7 of the 8 planets in the solar system uninhabited by life? Why build 7 planets, possibly 100 million other solar systems in our galaxy and 100 billion other galaxies, just for l'il old us?

    The earth is 4.7 billion years old. For 900 million years it was sterile. For the next billion years beyond that life was single cells much simpler than those that exist today.

    Only in the last 700 million years of Earth's history has multi-cellular plant and animal life dominated the planet.

    Humans, or our ancestors, have only been about for 0.1% of the lifetime of the planer. If God's so all powerful, either he had a lot of time to waste, was incredibly lazy, or else we are the result of 4.7 billion years of random happenings, eventually directed by biological evolution. We wouldn't exist but for a rodent that survived the time of the dinosaurs - 220 million to 65 million years ago.

    Either God made all the evidence for this up, so we doubters could be cast into hell - which seems a pretty evil trick to play - or the evidence is correct and either God likes wasting a lot of time or the religious are wasting theirs.

    The evil perpetrated in the name of "God" by religions that:

    Believe it is better for a woman raped in war to carry the resulting foetus to term.

    Believe it is better for a thousand young women to die in back-street clinics or using a coat-hanger on themselves than a single ball of cells to be terminated in a clinical procedure.

    Allow clerics to teach, in countries with low standards of education, that the use of condoms promotes the AIDs virus.

    There are almost countless other examples. And these people usually claim superior morals.

    Keep up the good thoughts!

    Cheers,

    John

    May 30, 2008  
    Blogger Richard said...

    Interesting but you assume God is a life form - it ain't necessarily so. Jung might have explained God as a collective subconscious, a cultural commonality or 'goodness'. Hence God can only exist when humans have evolved to think about the purpose of life. Christians perhaps find it easier to understand goodness as an external person who controls events, or chooses not to do so.

    October 24, 2008  
    Blogger Gordon said...

    Hello Richard,
    I see your point but that version of God would not be the God of Christianity or the God described in the bible. It would in fact be a general force of goodness. Such forces do exist but they exist because they help society to work, especially a tribal society where you might only meet the same 20 or 30 people throughout your entire life. In other words there is a Darwinian explanation for people being good and it does not rquire any concept of God.

    October 24, 2008  
    Blogger Alan said...

    I noticed Gordon,that you that you have started to ignore my comments on your various topics. I offered no abuse or anything other than debatable and reasonable points.

    I was actually planning to offer you a debate outside of your blogdom, but alas, it seems I am persona non grata.

    July 28, 2009  
    Blogger Gordon said...

    I am rather busy with other things and I am not keen on engaging with people who write this sort of thing about me.

    July 28, 2009  
    Blogger Alan said...

    I thought it was reaonable to write about you in the same genre as you wrote about Grady McMurtry.

    People who live in glass house shouldn't throw stones.

    July 30, 2009  
    Blogger Gordon said...

    No.

    You accused me of "trying to highlight things which he believes discredit the man and therefore discredit his 'opinion' or his scientific reasoning."

    I actually highlighted his lack of scientific expertise in the areas he was making bold statements about.

    You are a prime example of why I distrust Christians so much these days. They have one way of treating friends and a different way of treating the rest of the world.

    July 30, 2009  

    Post a Comment

    Links to this post:

    Create a Link

    << Home